Estimating chagas disease prevalence and number of underdiagnosed, and undertreated individuals in Spain.

BACKGROUND: Chagas disease constitutes a public health problem, and Spain is the non-endemic country with the highest burden of disease outside the Americas. It represents a model for non-endemic countries regarding health policies to control the disease. This study is aimed to generate estimates of the T.cruzi prevalence and the number of undetected and untreated individuals with the infection in Spain and to compare them with the actual number of cases reported by official sources. METHODS: Using aggregate data collected from the literature and official sources (Spanish National Statistics Institute; Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices) from 2010 to 2018, this study estimates the number of Chagas disease cases, plus the underdiagnosis and undertreatment rates. RESULTS: We estimated that 55,367 out of 2,602,285 migrants originally from endemic countries were living with Chagas disease in Spain in 2018, accounting for a prevalence of 2.1%. Only 1% of these cases(613/455,566) were children aged 14 years or less resulting in a prevalence of 0.1%. Bolivian migrants accounted for 53.9% of the total estimated cases. The index of underdiagnosis and undertreatment were heterogeneous across different Spanish autonomous regions, but the overall index of underdiagnosis was around 71%, and the overall index of undertreatment was 82.5% in patients aged 15 years or older, and 60% in children. CONCLUSION: The burden of Chagas disease in Spain is considerable. Index of underdiagnosis and undertreatment are high, particularly in women of childbearing age, but they have improved in children since the implementation of antenatal screening programmes.

Desarrollo de medicamentos huérfanos para enfermedades raras: guía rápida para investigadores

Guía que pretende mostrar los pasos que debe superar una nueva terapia para una enfermedad rara para que acabe llegando al paciente, con el objetivo de ayudar a planificar y entender mejor los retos que van a encontrar los investigadores a medida que avanzan en el desarrollo de esa nueva terapia. Incluye: qué es un medicamento huérfano, qué necesito para poder solicitar una designación huérfana, fases desde la designación hasta el paciente...

Cost-effectiveness analysis of triple therapy with protease inhibitors in treatment-naive hepatitis C patients.

BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis C is the leading cause of chronic liver disease, representing a significant burden in terms of morbidity, mortality and costs. A new scenario of therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection is being established with the approval of two effective HCV protease inhibitors (PIs) in combination with the standard of care (SOC), peginterferon and ribavirin. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to estimate the cost effectiveness of combination therapy with new PIs (boceprevir and telaprevir) plus peginterferon and ribavirin versus SOC in treatment-naive patients with HCV genotype 1 according to data obtained from clinical trials (CTs). METHODS: A Markov model simulating chronic HCV progression was used to estimate disease treatment costs and effects over patients' lifetimes, in the Spanish national public healthcare system. The target population was treatment-naive patients with chronic HCV genotype 1, demographic characteristics for whom were obtained from the published pivotal CTs SPRINT and ADVANCE. Three options were analysed for each PI based on results from the two CTs: universal triple therapy, interleukin (IL)-28B-guided therapy and dual therapy with peginterferon and ribavirin. A univariate sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the uncertainty of certain parameters: age at start of treatment, transition probabilities, drug costs, CT efficacy results and a higher hazard ratio for all-cause mortality for patients with chronic HCV. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses were also carried out. RESULTS: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of €2012 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained were used as outcome measures. According to the base-case analysis, using dual therapy as the comparator, the alternative IL28B-guided therapy presents a more favorable ICER (€18,079/QALY for boceprevir and €25,914/QALY for telaprevir) than the universal triple therapy option (€27,594/QALY for boceprevir and €33,751/QALY for telaprevir), with an ICER clearly below the efficiency threshold for medical interventions in the Spanish setting. Sensitivity analysis showed that age at the beginning of treatment was an important factor that influenced the ICER. A potential reduction in PI costs would also clearly improve the ICER, and transition probabilities influenced the results, but to a lesser extent. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that 95 % of the simulations presented an ICER below €40,000/QALY. Post hoc estimations of sustained virological responses of the IL28B-guided therapeutic option represented a limitation of the study. CONCLUSION: The therapeutic options analysed for the base-case cohort can be considered cost-effective interventions for the Spanish healthcare framework. Sensitivity analysis estimated an acceptability threshold of the IL28B-guided strategy of patients younger than 60 years.

Bioequivalence between generic tacrolimus products marketed in Spain by adjusted indirect comparison.

PURPOSE: The objective of the study was to investigate the relative bioavailability between the generic tacrolimus products that are presently authorized in Spain by adjusted indirect comparison. This was based on demonstration of bioequivalence with the reference product (Prograf, Astellas Pharma), which makes these generic tacrolimus products prescribable, switchable and therapeutically equivalent to the reference product; yet, according to Spanish legislation, only prescribers can switch tacrolimus-containing products. METHODS: Data from independent bioequivalence studies that compare each generic product with the reference product were combined by adjusted indirect comparisons to investigate the relative bioavailability between generic drug products, since there is no direct bioequivalence study comparing generics to each other. RESULTS: Eight generic tacrolimus products in the form of capsules are presently authorized in Spain, but only five are marketed. These eight products represent only three different generic product developments. One product is authorized with four different names/companies, while another is authorized under three different names/companies. The adjusted indirect comparisons between generic products show bioequivalence within the conventional 80-125 % confidence interval acceptance criteria for area under the curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax). CONCLUSION: Not only are the generic products bioequivalent with the reference product, but also with each other.

Investigation on the need of multiple dose bioequivalence studies for prolonged-release generic products.

In the European Union multiple dose bioequivalence studies are required for the approval of generic prolonged-release products, but they are not required by the US-FDA. In order to investigate if the multiple dose bioequivalence studies are necessary, the bioequivalence studies assessed in the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Care Products in the last 10 years were searched to find all reasons for rejection and identify those cases where the multiple dose study had failed to show bioequivalence and the single dose study had shown bioequivalence. In these latter cases, the plasma concentration at the end of the dosing interval (C(τ)) in the single dose study was assessed to investigate its sensitivity to predict non-bioequivalence in the steady state. The search identified six cases where the non-equivalence in the multiple dose study was not detected by the corresponding single dose study. C(τ) was not able to detect the difference in five cases and in general it was more variable than conventional metrics. In conclusion, the multiple dose bioequivalence study is necessary to ensure therapeutic equivalence and the use of C(τ) would be counterproductive, increasing the sample size of the studies without enough sensitivity to detect differences in the steady state.

Intercambiabilidad entre equivalentes terapéuticos de lamotrigina / Interchangeability among therapeutics equivalents of lamotrigine

No disponible